[NetBehaviour] according to Mark Tribe
geert at nznl.com
Fri May 27 07:26:07 CEST 2005
I seem to remember a similar thread over at rhizome --- anyone???
On 26-mei-05, at 19:18, marc wrote:
> HI ARN,
> NET ART OFFICIALLY DEAD!
> Submitted by murphy on Mon, 2005-05-23 17:47. arts
> NET ART DEAD!
> Mark Tribe has called it in the press release for inSite_05:
>> Although artists continue to work online in ever greater numbers, net
>> art as a movement is now over. But to say that the net is just
>> another medium along with video, painting, installation, etc. would
>> be misleading. The net is both a medium and a platform, a set of
>> tools for art-making and a distribution channel for reaching people.
>> The net can still enable artists to reach a global audience without
>> the assistance of art world institutions. Equally important, it can
>> enable artists to reach audiences that never set foot in a gallery,
>> museum or performance space. M.T. (* title from ‘Tijuana for Dummies’
>> by Hiperboreal)"
>> linked from Net Art Review...
>> As a movement - I feel it is just begining another phase...
>> marc wrote:
>>> *On Net art Review,*
>>> I noticed this short statement below
>>> Tuesday, May 24, 2005 ::
>>> So, *Net Art is dead* according to Mark Tribe, as published in the
>>> InSite 05 press release.
>>> I would like to know what others think about this statement by Mark
>> I didn't find the word 'dead' neither in the curatorial statement
>> from MT:
>> nor in the press release:
>> where is exactly this statement ?
>> yann / ARN
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 2453 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the NetBehaviour