[NetBehaviour] Internet Service to Put Classic TV on Home Computer

marc marc.garrett at furtherfield.org
Sun Nov 20 18:04:27 CET 2005

Hi clemos,

My own personal opinion, is that the Internet is best when people have 
the choice to mediate themselves, in respect of the in-put of their 
information exchange- and as more corporate ran movies get put on the 
Internet, the more there is an excuse to stop other creative outlets 
that are less connected to the needs of such businesses. I will paste 
various bits of info linked to this as time goes by for all to view....

 >maybe it's a bit naive, but anyway, I prefer to get something freely 
and legally, even with a bit of ads (ex: google, tv channels, porn 
websites ;) ).

I'm a bit of a situationist at heart, although nituationist at heart, 
although not one at the same time, like I would not call myself an 
anarchist- but I do respect the ideas and reasons by those who have 
written and explored these life-options. So, the spectcle of it all, 
unnerves me- makes me wonder what we could be losing here? My own 
personal distate towards the encroachment of corporate advertisements, 
via its linking with net-based creativity, is not a logical reasoning at 
all, just like most people's desiresto be consumed by external 
mediations, that numb the mind, is also not logical. All I know here, is 
that the more that these 'controlling', 'patent-frenzy' companies get 
involved- probably through the back-door of creative industries, then we 
have the problem of censorship and copyright on even more of our 
(creative) freedoms, that we presently enjoy on the Internet. It stands 
to reason that recent debates around 'who owns the Internet', is closely 
connected, and needs all of us to acknowledge how much we want to lose 
in respect of what we all have now...

The corporations regarding our freedoms are not going to stop pushing, 
pushing, pushing- so we need to be aware of, or at least think about- if 
we really want to accept it, or if what has been good so far, to 
disappear through our fingers. Remember, there has been a rise in 
Internet use the last few years and television and film companies have 
lost revenue because of this, much of the activism of the past few years 
has been using the Internet as a news resource and independent debate- 
commercial companies will not tolerate freedom of speech, that in 
contrast challenges their 'advertisements for products' once they get a 
better grip on whats happening out there.


>actually my "good news" comment was rather quickly written and the
>whole message sent faster than I wanted ... (understand: I'm stupid,
>but not the way you were expecting)
>yet, I dont really believe in "zombification" by advertisement; I do
>believe that the more you are flooded by ads, the more you simply
>learn to ignore them. (the problem with spam-mail is a bit different :
>bandwidth, storage, and time loss ...)
>maybe it's a bit naive, but anyway, I prefer to get something freely
>and legally, even with a bit of ads (ex: google, tv channels, porn
>websites ;) ).
>"real" people are nice to choose the free/no ads way, but I would
>obviously not blame those people if they try to earn their life with
>their work the way they choose to, through corporate ads or something
>On 11/15/05, marc <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org> wrote:
>>To me, this is not good news at all...
>>It is yet another zombification of the net, another form of legalized
>>spam- with the aim of advertising more banal, products.
>>We do not need any more films - we can get them already on dvd, or from
>>bit torrent, on our own terms without the advertsiing. Or on digital
>>channels with advertising.
>>I'd rather see net art films that are featured by real (non coporate
>>driven) people, like on DVblog.org anytime...
>>>good news
>>>- - -
>>>Internet Service to Put Classic TV on Home Computer
>>>Looking for "The Fugitive?" Didn't get enough "Eight Is Enough?" Would
>>>you like to "Welcome Back, Kotter" one more time?
>>>Warner Brothers is preparing a major new Internet service that will
>>>let fans watch full episodes from more than 100 old television series.
>>>The service, called In2TV, will be free, supported by advertising, and
>>>will start early next year. More than 4,800 episodes will be made
>>>available online in the first year.
>>>NetBehaviour mailing list
>>>NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>>NetBehaviour mailing list
>>NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>NetBehaviour mailing list
>NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org

More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list