[NetBehaviour] Re: [webartery] motion picture revisited

[Michael Szpakowski]

Thanks Alan!
appreciated  - though kind of double edged for me in a
way too, as, although I put a lot of work into the
piece, it still has the feeling for me of an exercise
or study.
Actually I think it is quite Sondheim like - ( & much
more accidentally so than some of my QT movies where I
think your movie work definitely opened up new ways of
thinking about image for me) -in that the sense of
motion in it ( which given my lack of programming
skill I can't claim is anything like worked out in
advance) reminds me a bit of some of your motion
capture stuff..
thanks for looking & very best wishes
michael



--- Alan Sondheim <sondheim at panix.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> I think this is by far the best/most original of
> your work I've seen - and 
> it holds up for repeated viewing; it also stands up
> well in relation to 
> abstract film / animation in general - Alan
> 
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Michael Szpakowski wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> > Anyone remotely diverted by last weeks b&w 'motion
> > picture', you might like to try this full colour
> > version - there's more visual variety too.
> >
> >
>
http://www.somedancersandmusicians.com/motion_picture/index.html
> >
> > carries a bit more weight, this one, at 15Kb
> > best
> > michael
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ( URLs/DVDs/CDroms/books/etc. see
> http://www.asondheim.org/advert.txt -
> revised 7/05 )
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/webartery/
> 
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
> to:
>     webartery-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
> 
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>  
> 
> 
>