Re: [NetBehaviour] Military Using Post-Structuralism as “Operational Theory”
marc
marc.garrett at furtherfield.org
Mon Aug 7 13:26:20 CEST 2006
Hi Rob & all,
Yes - one of the pitfalls of being involved, engaged with and exploring
contemporary cultures and related dynamics, especially social theory and
practise etc is that, at the same time there are also legions of
individuals/groups who use such data and its ideas for less humanistic
endeavours.
It is of course is, no surprise that our governments and own cultures
have not taken it upon themselves to seriously explore further, ways of
'not killing'.
Perhaps our over-controlling, patriarchal systems should be re-examined
and broken down, so that societies/humanity can see what else we can use
beyond such basic grunt-like behaviours. Without the 'ilk' of rabid
military and power hungry apes breathing down our necks. Of course, this
is a catch 22 situation.
"I asked Naveh why Deleuze and Guattari were so popular with the Israeli
military. He replied that ‘several of the concepts in A Thousand
Plateaux became instrumental for us […] allowing us to explain
contemporary situations in a way that we could not have otherwise. It
problematized our own paradigms. Most important was the distinction they
have pointed out between the concepts of “smooth” and “striated” space
[which accordingly reflect] the organizational concepts of the “war
machine” and the “state apparatus”. In the IDF we now often use the term
“to smooth out space” when we want to refer to operation in a space as
if it had no borders. […] Palestinian areas could indeed be thought of
as “striated” in the sense that they are enclosed by fences, walls,
ditches, roads blocks and so on.’5 When I asked him if moving through
walls was part of it, he explained that, ‘In Nablus the IDF understood
urban fighting as a spatial problem. […] Travelling through walls is a
simple mechanical solution that connects theory and practice." Eyal Weizman.
There are so many factors that seem to grip onto humanity like an ever
repeating neurosis- pulling us down, drowning us all, in the
suffocating, primordial swamp:-
Fundamentalism - as in the male top-down eugenic and socially
constructed remits, that are dominating and exploiting religion, with
astounding ignorance and childish bigotry. Imposing evoltuion for their
own ends, thus holding back real human developments and progress.
masculinity - as in the male, always over-eager to fight, armed with
ignorance, guns and bigotry via systems put in place, usually ready to
support such hegemonies.
Patriarchism - as in mechanistic systems of hierarchies as default,
serving to support such imperialist powers on civilians and communities,
above all else - at whatever cost.
Corporate Mediation - The patriarchal dominated press and news
corporations, such as Rupert Murdoch's empire etc, regurtitating basic
hegemonies and nationalistic attitides to fuel more uncertainty amongst
those who should know better.
it goes on and on...
marc
"In no uncertain terms, education in the humanities – often believed to
be the
most powerful weapon against imperialism – is being appropriated as a
powerful
vehicle for imperialism. The military’s use of theory is, of course, nothing
new – a long line extends all the way from Marcus Aurelius to General
Patton."
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php?story=20060801170800738
- Rob.
--
Furtherfield - http://www.furtherfield.org
HTTP - http://www.http.uk.net
Node.London - http://www.nodel.org
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list