[NetBehaviour] Secret nuclear bases to be shown on public maps.
marc
marc.garrett at furtherfield.org
Thu Aug 10 00:39:49 CEST 2006
Secret nuclear bases to be shown on public maps.
Military sites and spy centres will be revealed by Ordnance Survey.
By Severin Carrell
The Independent.
The precise locations of dozens of secret military and spy bases are to
be revealed on Ordnance Survey maps for the first time, ending one of
the last remaining legacies of the Cold War. For decades, tourists and
ramblers have stumbled across secret radar bases, nuclear bomb stores
and rocket testing ranges tucked away in quiet woods or remote hillsides
because they had been "airbrushed" out of even the most detailed
official maps.
But the Government's security chiefs have quietly abandoned that policy
by scrapping its list of secret military and intelligence facilities -
known officially as the "sensitive sites register". The decision was
made earlier this year by the Cabinet Office but never formally
announced; it acknowledged that the internet had defeated its attempts
at secrecy.
Aerial and satellite photographs of the country are available on the
internet, while web-based mapping services such as Multimap are
competing directly with Ordnance Survey (OS). The change in policy means
the last remaining 50 sites on the register - including the nuclear
warhead factory at Burghfield in Berkshire - will now be marked on all
the maps printed by OS.
The obsession with secrecy, which deepened once spying by the Soviet
Union intensified during the Cold War, has been relaxed recently. The
"sensitive sites register" has been slowly whittled down and OS has
begun including some sensitive sites on its most detailed Explorer
series of maps, but anomalies remain.
In western Scotland, buildings and railway tracks for Glen Douglas
armament depot near Faslane nuclear submarine base are marked but
unnamed on the most detailed Explorer maps, but are "airbrushed" out of
the larger-scale touring maps. A rocket testing range in Wyre Forest
near Kidderminster, Worcestershire, is shown by an unnamed rectangular
field in the detailed maps, but omitted in all large-scale maps.
Some of the most sensitive sites will still not be named or will have
misleading labels such as "disused airfield" or "depot". But the
decision is a victory for anti-secrecy campaigners such as Alan
Turnbull, an internet enthusiast who first exposed the availability of
this apparently secret mapping data on the web.
more...
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article1215961.ece
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list