[NetBehaviour] accident of art book
ken at sqallp.freeserve.co.uk
Sat Nov 25 21:12:43 CET 2006
hi James good of your to remain in contact
The 'bloke' you refer to is a depiction of Prometheus who breathed life
into mankind and gave them fire because they were so cold and
Zeus was angry and chained prometheus to a precipice with an eagle
pecking his liver out. so he's in a bit of pain.
I use the idea as a metaphor and intent to continue this trait into a
I sometime find emailing people a bit frustrating because people us it
in a fragmentary way and this is what I see as a networking failure.
The three figures at the bottom of the page represent a failure in
I hope my metaphors and symbolism has a resonance with you.
If not then - anyway these things take time to find common ground and
I'm just trying to do a good job as an artist.
Being an artist is hard work. By the way I have ordered the book
'accident of art' and will let you know how I get on.
All the best
On Nov 23, 2006, at 21:26, <james at jwm-art.net> wrote:
> I had a look at the site a few days ago. The paintings are a lot
> different to those I last saw on your blog. The one with the
> red/ochre/cyan face, next to the "critically human think I am
> therefore" photo, I thought was sticking his fingers up to the viewer,
> but eventually saw it's a bloke falling headfirst. That right? Or's it
> a umm, thingy like old what'is name, picabia, double image?
> The three figures below it are quite entertaining too. It's interesting
> what you mention about the local; familiar territory, and thought.
> which might be something to do with what I do with art, or maybe just
> what I think I do. But whichever, I'm still not quite yet familier with
> them infact to both know exactly what the difference is, and put it
> On 19/11/2006, "Ken Turner" <ken at sqallp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi James
>> One of the issues that Virilio deals with is the idea of speed as it
>> effects perception.
>> I think it also effects/infects subjectivity.
>> If you are interested in painting please see the site below.
>> On Nov 16, 2006, at 00:47, <james at jwm-art.net> wrote:
>>> Has anyone read "The Accident of Art" by Paul Virilio and Sylvère
>>> Lotringer? It is an "extended conversation" between them. I generally
>>> find it difficult to understand criticism, the terms used, but by the
>>> end of the book I think I had a vague idea of what they were talking
>>> It goes something like this: The accident of art, or in fact it
>>> more general, the accident of globalization/capitalism, is the
>>> correction of perception by machine. And, that we need to constantly
>>> fight against the machine and get inside of it to change it. Anyhow
>>> was interesting but I thought that in particularly the way they
>>> about the digital and analogue and the internet, Sondhiem (probably
>>> others do too but I'm not aware of much) goes into greater depth.
>>> But the biggest thing that bugged me was the quick discussion about
>>> software. Initially they spoke of architects and how they should
>>> their own software. Then a bit later, they question who are the
>>> programmers? They're sure it's not Bill gates. And they lamented the
>>> fact that no one goes about writing their own software. Me thinks
>>> need to research that a little more.
>>> I probably read it too quickly to understand more.
>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
More information about the NetBehaviour