[NetBehaviour] erhu

[leon at c6.org]

It is also difficult to filter responses to a list, as they all come from
the same email address?
Amy solutions gladly welcome.

leon

-----Original Message-----
From: netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org
[mailto:netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org] On Behalf Of leon at c6.org
Sent: den 6 januari 2007 01:05
To: 'NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity'
Subject: RE: [NetBehaviour] erhu 

I neither asked for him to be stilled or censored, just explained
I stated that I felt bombarded by his mails 
Confused and that because of my lack of understanding they appear as
nonsense, I think your mail has shed little light as to their meaning 
but perhaps alan may

leon

-----Original Message-----
From: netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org
[mailto:netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Szpakowski
Sent: den 6 januari 2007 00:41
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
Subject: RE: [NetBehaviour] erhu 

<but find the constant bombardment
 by you sometimes overwhelming>
Gosh, Leon, what a delicate little flower you must be!
Personally I love Alan's work & I'm delighted to see
him posting here.
But even if I (or lots of other folk) *didn't* like
it, it's not as if one person posting took up space
that could be used by others, a list being a pretty
much infinitely elastic space.
If you don't care for it, your loss, filter it.
I've got no problem with discussions of what Alan's,
or anyone else's work, means. Excellent! let's have
that discussion - but your suggestion that one of the
creative voices on this list should be limited or
stilled, I find both ungenerous & somewhat
disturbing...
michael
 
--- leon at c6.org wrote:

> Can you explain this text,
> Is the notion that it is some way art mean that it
> has no meaning other than
> its feel.
> I cant believe trhat in this day and age of over
> communication that we
> should pick our way through such nonsense.
> Do we have too much information, I think we do
> I enjoy this list but find the constant bombardment
> by you sometimes
> overwhelming and I wondered if this would be a TOPIC
> of conversation on this
> list
> 
> leon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org
> [mailto:netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org] On
> Behalf Of Alan Sondheim
> Sent: den 5 januari 2007 08:33
> To: netbehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> Subject: [NetBehaviour] erhu 
> 
> 
> 
> erhu
> 
> the digital is sublime, infinite {avatars are
> backed, at the back of
> infinite space}
> 
> digital {0,1} constitutes a spectrum degree zero; if
> one is below, 0
> is above; if 0 is below, 1 is above. since nothing
> exists between one
> and the other, nothing from one is attainable by the
> other; one and
> the other are mutually sublime. the backs of avatars
> are against the
> wall of digital space; there's nowhere left to go.
> 
> understand this and you understand the phenomenology
> of the digital-
> in-relation, the analog-in-relation.
> 
> http://www.asondheim.org/erhu.wav chinese erhu with
> echo and filtering
> beautiful music
> 
> http://www.asondheim.org/godandnumbers.mp3 shortwave
> numbers station
> colliding with religious preaching, filtered
> transmission
> beautiful sound
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour