[NetBehaviour] erhu

Michael Szpakowski szpako at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 6 02:49:14 CET 2007


Your first e mail:
<I cant believe trhat in this day and age of over
 communication that we
 should pick our way through such nonsense>

This one:
<and that because of my lack of
 understanding they appear as
 nonsense>
spot the difference in tone! - if you didn't mean to
sound like you were advocating censoring Alan ( & by
implication anyone else on this list whose work
happens to displease you, or who, in your opinion,
posts too much ) then you should think more carefully
about how you express yourself.
michael

--- leon at c6.org wrote:

> I neither asked for him to be stilled or censored,
> just explained
> I stated that I felt bombarded by his mails 
> Confused and that because of my lack of
> understanding they appear as
> nonsense, I think your mail has shed little light as
> to their meaning 
> but perhaps alan may
> 
> leon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org
> [mailto:netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael
> Szpakowski
> Sent: den 6 januari 2007 00:41
> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed
> creativity
> Subject: RE: [NetBehaviour] erhu 
> 
> <but find the constant bombardment
>  by you sometimes overwhelming>
> Gosh, Leon, what a delicate little flower you must
> be!
> Personally I love Alan's work & I'm delighted to see
> him posting here.
> But even if I (or lots of other folk) *didn't* like
> it, it's not as if one person posting took up space
> that could be used by others, a list being a pretty
> much infinitely elastic space.
> If you don't care for it, your loss, filter it.
> I've got no problem with discussions of what Alan's,
> or anyone else's work, means. Excellent! let's have
> that discussion - but your suggestion that one of
> the
> creative voices on this list should be limited or
> stilled, I find both ungenerous & somewhat
> disturbing...
> michael
>  
> --- leon at c6.org wrote:
> 
> > Can you explain this text,
> > Is the notion that it is some way art mean that it
> > has no meaning other than
> > its feel.
> > I cant believe trhat in this day and age of over
> > communication that we
> > should pick our way through such nonsense.
> > Do we have too much information, I think we do
> > I enjoy this list but find the constant
> bombardment
> > by you sometimes
> > overwhelming and I wondered if this would be a
> TOPIC
> > of conversation on this
> > list
> > 
> > leon
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org
> > [mailto:netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org] On
> > Behalf Of Alan Sondheim
> > Sent: den 5 januari 2007 08:33
> > To: netbehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> > Subject: [NetBehaviour] erhu 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > erhu
> > 
> > the digital is sublime, infinite {avatars are
> > backed, at the back of
> > infinite space}
> > 
> > digital {0,1} constitutes a spectrum degree zero;
> if
> > one is below, 0
> > is above; if 0 is below, 1 is above. since nothing
> > exists between one
> > and the other, nothing from one is attainable by
> the
> > other; one and
> > the other are mutually sublime. the backs of
> avatars
> > are against the
> > wall of digital space; there's nowhere left to go.
> > 
> > understand this and you understand the
> phenomenology
> > of the digital-
> > in-relation, the analog-in-relation.
> > 
> > http://www.asondheim.org/erhu.wav chinese erhu
> with
> > echo and filtering
> > beautiful music
> > 
> > http://www.asondheim.org/godandnumbers.mp3
> shortwave
> > numbers station
> > colliding with religious preaching, filtered
> > transmission
> > beautiful sound
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > NetBehaviour mailing list
> > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >
>
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > NetBehaviour mailing list
> > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >
>
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 




More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list