[NetBehaviour] the ruling classes

dave miller dave.miller.uk at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 15:55:51 CEST 2008


hi marc

That's a good idea - that way I can make the strips under my 'control'
- saying what I want and how to say it - and at the same time the
collaboration can add to/ build on what I've done in unexpected ways,
and help build community around the work.

good stuff!

dave


2008/7/9 marc garrett <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>:
> Hi Dave & Patrick,
>
> Yes I remember this piece and liked it.
>
> Perhaps, as a way of getting an audience to view your strips (if
> regular), would be to offer the same strips again to visitors, where
> they can also fill in their own text/versions into the speach bubbles.
>
> marc
>
>
> hi patrick and marc
> Thanks for all the feedback - this is great!
> I have wondered if I should open up the work more - make it
> collaborative - as i always want to share the creation.
> I have got a cartoon generator that I built last year:
> http://davemiller.org/projects/cartoon_generator/
> and maybe I could tie it in with this?
> dave
>
> 2008/7/9 marc garrett <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>:
>  > > Hi Patrick & Dave,
>  > >
>  > > Your idea reminds me Andy Deck's project 'Panel Junction', it is of
>  > > course very different in respect of content, but the behaviour could be
>  > > similar...
>  > >
>  > > Panel Junction combines the graphic novel with forms of shared
>  > > authorship that have been made possible by the Internet.
>  > > http://artcontext.org/act/07/panel/
>  > >
>  > > marc
>  > >
>  > > Hi Dave and all
>  > > Would it be a good idea to leave one speech bubble blank for ner
>  > > behaviourists to fill in?
>  > > or not...
>  > > just a thought
>  > > bw
>  > > Patrick
>  > >
>  > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM, dave miller <dave.miller.uk at gmail.com>
>  > > wrote:
>  > >
>  > > Hi marc
>  > >
>  > > I'm going to have a go - it needs to be a regular thing I agree, as it
>  > > would have much more impact than a one-off. I could probably manage
>  > > one per week!
>  > >
>  > > cheers, dave
>  > >
>  > > 2008/7/9 marc garrett <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>:
>  > > > Hi Dave,
>  > > >
>  > > > I was wondering if there was a more regular pattern of work
> whether we
>  > > > could look forward to a weekly or bi-weekly edition?
>  > > >
>  > > > marc
>  > > >> hi marc
>  > > >>
>  > > >> Thanks for having a look. I'm exploring a few different comic
>  > > ideas at
>  > > >> the moment, and if one pops out that seems to work, I'll try to keep
>  > > >> it going regularly. You're right, there is a sort of journalistic
>  > > >> flavour to my work, I think I need to recognise this more. I'll keep
>  > > >> you posted on new installments!
>  > > >>
>  > > >> cheers, dave
>  > > >>
>  > > >> 2008/7/9 marc garrett <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>:
>  > > >>
>  > > >>> Hi Dave,
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>> Yes, it made me titter. It is interesting how much of your work
>  > > seems to
>  > > >>> maintain a flavour of newspaper journalism, somehow.
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>> Are these strips a regular, or occasional?
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>> marc
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>>> thanks michael!
>  > > >>>> dave
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>> 2008/7/8 Michael Szpakowski <szpako at yahoo.com>:
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>> it made *me* laugh :)
>  > > >>>>> I like your drawing style & you hit the creepiness of the new
>  > > toryism rather well. It's miles better than the ones they have in the
>  > > Guardian when Steve Bell isn't there...
>  > > >>>>> michael
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>> --- On Tue, 7/8/08, dave miller <dave.miller.uk at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>>> From: dave miller <dave.miller.uk at gmail.com>
>  > > >>>>>> Subject: [NetBehaviour] the ruling classes
>  > > >>>>>> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
>  > > <netbehaviour at netbehaviour.org>
>  > > >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 8:13 PM
>  > > >>>>>> I made this today:
>  > > >>>>>> http://davemiller.org/comix/rc_08_07_08.gif
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>> would it make a decent series? It's very London-centric
>  > > >>>>>> I realise
>  > > >>>>>> thanks, dave
>  > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>  > > >>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > >>>>>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > >>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>>>
>  > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
>  > > >>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > >>>>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > >>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>>>
>  > > >>>> _______________________________________________
>  > > >>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > >>>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > >>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>>>
>  > > >>> _______________________________________________
>  > > >>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > >>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > > >>>
>  > > >>>
>  > > >> _______________________________________________
>  > > >> NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > >> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > > >>
>  > > >>
>  > > >
>  > > > _______________________________________________
>  > > > NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > > >
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > NetBehaviour mailing list
>  > > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>  > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>  > >
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>



More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list