[NetBehaviour] the ruling classes

patrick simons patricksimons1 at googlemail.com
Thu Jul 10 13:18:55 CEST 2008 

Hi Dave,Marc and all
With or without the generator sounds good to me, maybe its too good to be
one project maybe it should be two of your projects, dunno..
maybe the three way interaction between youself, net behaviourists and the
generator would form a lovely loop...
I dont think it matters if you try one way and change your mind..
It is your work after all.
best wishes
Patrick

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:55 PM, dave miller <dave.miller.uk at gmail.com>
wrote:

> hi marc
>
> That's a good idea - that way I can make the strips under my 'control'
> - saying what I want and how to say it - and at the same time the
> collaboration can add to/ build on what I've done in unexpected ways,
> and help build community around the work.
>
> good stuff!
>
> dave
>
>
> 2008/7/9 marc garrett <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>:
> > Hi Dave & Patrick,
> >
> > Yes I remember this piece and liked it.
> >
> > Perhaps, as a way of getting an audience to view your strips (if
> > regular), would be to offer the same strips again to visitors, where
> > they can also fill in their own text/versions into the speach bubbles.
> >
> > marc
> >
> >
> > hi patrick and marc
> > Thanks for all the feedback - this is great!
> > I have wondered if I should open up the work more - make it
> > collaborative - as i always want to share the creation.
> > I have got a cartoon generator that I built last year:
> > http://davemiller.org/projects/cartoon_generator/
> > and maybe I could tie it in with this?
> > dave
> >
> > 2008/7/9 marc garrett <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>:
> >  > > Hi Patrick & Dave,
> >  > >
> >  > > Your idea reminds me Andy Deck's project 'Panel Junction', it is of
> >  > > course very different in respect of content, but the behaviour could
> be
> >  > > similar...
> >  > >
> >  > > Panel Junction combines the graphic novel with forms of shared
> >  > > authorship that have been made possible by the Internet.
> >  > > http://artcontext.org/act/07/panel/
> >  > >
> >  > > marc
> >  > >
> >  > > Hi Dave and all
> >  > > Would it be a good idea to leave one speech bubble blank for ner
> >  > > behaviourists to fill in?
> >  > > or not...
> >  > > just a thought
> >  > > bw
> >  > > Patrick
> >  > >
> >  > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM, dave miller <dave.miller.uk@
> gmail.com>
> >  > > wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > > Hi marc
> >  > >
> >  > > I'm going to have a go - it needs to be a regular thing I agree, as
> it
> >  > > would have much more impact than a one-off. I could probably manage
> >  > > one per week!
> >  > >
> >  > > cheers, dave
> >  > >
> >  > > 2008/7/9 marc garrett <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>:
> >  > > > Hi Dave,
> >  > > >
> >  > > > I was wondering if there was a more regular pattern of work
> > whether we
> >  > > > could look forward to a weekly or bi-weekly edition?
> >  > > >
> >  > > > marc
> >  > > >> hi marc
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >> Thanks for having a look. I'm exploring a few different comic
> >  > > ideas at
> >  > > >> the moment, and if one pops out that seems to work, I'll try to
> keep
> >  > > >> it going regularly. You're right, there is a sort of journalistic
> >  > > >> flavour to my work, I think I need to recognise this more. I'll
> keep
> >  > > >> you posted on new installments!
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >> cheers, dave
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >> 2008/7/9 marc garrett <marc.garrett at furtherfield.org>:
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >>> Hi Dave,
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>> Yes, it made me titter. It is interesting how much of your work
> >  > > seems to
> >  > > >>> maintain a flavour of newspaper journalism, somehow.
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>> Are these strips a regular, or occasional?
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>> marc
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>>> thanks michael!
> >  > > >>>> dave
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>>> 2008/7/8 Michael Szpakowski <szpako at yahoo.com>:
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>>>> it made *me* laugh :)
> >  > > >>>>> I like your drawing style & you hit the creepiness of the new
> >  > > toryism rather well. It's miles better than the ones they have in
> the
> >  > > Guardian when Steve Bell isn't there...
> >  > > >>>>> michael
> >  > > >>>>>
> >  > > >>>>>
> >  > > >>>>> --- On Tue, 7/8/08, dave miller <dave.miller.uk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >  > > >>>>>
> >  > > >>>>>
> >  > > >>>>>
> >  > > >>>>>> From: dave miller <dave.miller.uk at gmail.com>
> >  > > >>>>>> Subject: [NetBehaviour] the ruling classes
> >  > > >>>>>> To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity"
> >  > > <netbehaviour at netbehaviour.org>
> >  > > >>>>>> Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 8:13 PM
> >  > > >>>>>> I made this today:
> >  > > >>>>>> http://davemiller.org/comix/rc_08_07_08.gif
> >  > > >>>>>>
> >  > > >>>>>> would it make a decent series? It's very London-centric
> >  > > >>>>>> I realise
> >  > > >>>>>> thanks, dave
> >  > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >  > > >>>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > >>>>>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > >>>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > > >>>>>>
> >  > > >>>>>>
> >  > > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >  > > >>>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > >>>>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > >>>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > > >>>>>
> >  > > >>>>>
> >  > > >>>>>
> >  > > >>>> _______________________________________________
> >  > > >>>> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > >>>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > >>>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>>>
> >  > > >>> _______________________________________________
> >  > > >>> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > >>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > >>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >>>
> >  > > >> _______________________________________________
> >  > > >> NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > >> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > >> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >>
> >  > > >
> >  > > > _______________________________________________
> >  > > > NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > > >
> >  > > _______________________________________________
> >  > > NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > _______________________________________________
> >  > > NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > > _______________________________________________
> >  > > NetBehaviour mailing list
> >  > > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> >  > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >  > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NetBehaviour mailing list
> > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NetBehaviour mailing list
> > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20080710/add2d64a/attachment.htm>

More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list