[NetBehaviour] Driven- a dilemma of coexistence - by Marc Garrett and Ruth Catlow

marc garrett marc.garrett at furtherfield.org
Mon Mar 10 11:06:47 CET 2008

Hi Dave,

Getting back into making the stuff again, is opening up many 
possibilities. I think that what is freeing things up much more for us 
these days is that we actually do not need to do it as an art form 
officially, and definitely not in response to any curatorial or 
theoretical dialogue. Not that we ever did anyway -  but culturally 
there is less pressure to perform to other people's agendas. We can just 
get on with it and explore.

The dialogue here is between Ruth and myself, the technology and the 
content and whoever wishes to experience it. Thus, no top down concepts 
anymore - they are up for grabs (creatively) which is great, and it also 
gives us a chance to explore themes and issues that relate to our 
personal lives, and hopefully with others who may know these ideas and 
experiences, from their own contexts. Such as yourself with the traffic 
in London, which this work highlights.

In the car, Ruth is the driver and I am a passenger and I am a terrible 
passenger, always commenting on Ruth's driving or situations as they 
happen. I actually have not learned to drive yet. Ruth is a very good 
driver and is tolerant of my side-quips.

I think that the theme initially tries to bring people into the work as 
a starting point and then as you stay with it a bit more, deeper things 
happen. This may not necessarily be immediately explainable, but through 
visiting it again one becomes more connected to ambiance of the piece 
and different levels of nuance, or whatever it is.

 >I like the simplicity of this as well - focussing on expressing the 
idea and not on sophisticated technology.

I think that the mysteriousness around the use of technology in art and 
the kind of macho tech-fetish that many organizations have over 
promoted, has had a dis-empowering effect on the culture of media art 
(or whatever we call it). I want to get back to the roots again. For me, 
it is not about how powerful or clever one is with the medium, it's the 
craft, the skill, the content and art as a whole. What I mean by this is 
that, to be seen by these organizations media platforms, it seems as 
though the work itself must have a large budget, or to of been promoted 
via a certain institution, or a top media art theorist. Which is not 
always a bad thing, but what is wrong is if these type of projects are 
given more credence over less supported works that perhaps did not need 
any funding etc...

If you look at various platforms, who are (supposedly) supporting 
(media) art, you will notice that many of the projects are funded by 
MIT, or creative industry, and the small guy making the work on their 
own terms are not given as much space at the moment. This is because a 
new hegemony is taking over and the voice of the art-maker is being 
pushed out. (We) I think that this is unhealthy and we need to grab back 
our art culture now, and begin again and reclaim our creative noise. And 
in starting to make the work again means that we can become part of a 
hopefully growing and expanding group of artists who are connected in 
some way.

It's the Art Stupid!!!

The above is what I tell myself over and over again now...

Thanks Dave.

> Hi Ruth and marc
> I really like this, especially that you're dealing with a subject that
> is part of daily life, and I can relate to. Driving in London is hell,
> seriously unpleasant and often very threatening. It's difficult to
> know how to respond rationally when someone has tried to drive you off
> the road, or even tried to kill you (it often feels like that) and
> it's difficult to stay calm. Should you accept what the other driver
> has done or should you seek revenge? And it's a major cause of
> arguments for sure
> I like the simplicity of this as well - focussing on expressing the
> idea and not on sophisticated technology.
> cheers, dave
> On 08/03/2008, Ruth Catlow <ruth.catlow at furtherfield.org> wrote:
>> Driven- a dilemma of coexistence
>>  by Marc Garrett and Ruth Catlow
>>  ---------------------------------------------
>>  http://diwologue.net/driven/
>>  ---------------------------------------------
>>  Two people attempt to resolve a recurring argument. Their
>>  conversation is transcribed into 2 frames in a single browser. Lag
>>  starts to interfere with the flow of statements and responses.
>>  'Driven' can be viewed in most Internet browsers and requires no
>>  plugins. It can be accessed in two ways. Either by individuals with
>>  personal computers, who can click through the work at their own pace,
>>  or projected with sound in public spaces where it has its own tempo.
>>  The first page may take a while to load. Please turn up your volume.
>>  ---------------------------------------------
>>  This is the first in a planned series of artworks for DIWOlogue by
>>  Marc Garrett and Ruth Catlow.  During March 2008 Marc Garrett and
>>  Ruth Catlow are researching tools and creating collaborative artworks
>>  and online events as part of the Liminal Screens Residency Programme
>>  with the support of the BNMI at the Banff Centre.
>>  For more info  - Visit the blog http://diwologue.net/blog/
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  NetBehaviour mailing list
>>  NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>>  http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list