[NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

[helen varley jamieson]

bloody hell - it was deleted it again yesterday immediately after i 
reposted it! (luckily i saved it offline ...). they've also deleted the 
UpStage page which i had redone (even tho it is my own project - but it 
was recommended in the cyberformance deletion discussion & then no-one 
seemed to be doing it so i did it)

working out the deletion review process is giving me a headache - i'm 
going to have to go out & hack some foliage for a while ...

grrrrr ...
h : (

Rob Myers wrote:
> Here is the discussion page for the original deletion -
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Furtherfield
>
> Here are the notability criteria for web sites -
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WEB
>
> We need to assemble examples of mentions of Furtherfield in web, media
> or literature and go for a deletion review -
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review
>
> The more impressive the tome or the site, the better.
>
> Bizarrely Wikipedia doesn't seem to have notability guidelines for arts
> organizations or galleries. I would argue that they should have de facto
> notability!
>
> I don't think I can edit the page (Wikipedia are strict about people not
> editing pages they actually know about^d^d are involved in), but we can
> assemble a good case here and then deliver it to the review.
>
> - Rob.
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


-- 
____________________________________________________________

helen varley jamieson: creative catalyst       
helen at creative-catalyst.com   
http://www.creative-catalyst.com
http://www.avatarbodycollision.org
http://www.upstage.org.nz
http://www.writerfind.com/hjamieson.htm
____________________________________________________________