[NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

marc garrett marc.garrett at furtherfield.org
Wed Nov 26 23:25:35 CET 2008


3 more grrrrr's...

marc
> bloody hell - it was deleted it again yesterday immediately after i 
> reposted it! (luckily i saved it offline ...). they've also deleted the 
> UpStage page which i had redone (even tho it is my own project - but it 
> was recommended in the cyberformance deletion discussion & then no-one 
> seemed to be doing it so i did it)
>
> working out the deletion review process is giving me a headache - i'm 
> going to have to go out & hack some foliage for a while ...
>
> grrrrr ...
> h : (
>
> Rob Myers wrote:
>   
>> Here is the discussion page for the original deletion -
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Furtherfield
>>
>> Here are the notability criteria for web sites -
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WEB
>>
>> We need to assemble examples of mentions of Furtherfield in web, media
>> or literature and go for a deletion review -
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review
>>
>> The more impressive the tome or the site, the better.
>>
>> Bizarrely Wikipedia doesn't seem to have notability guidelines for arts
>> organizations or galleries. I would argue that they should have de facto
>> notability!
>>
>> I don't think I can edit the page (Wikipedia are strict about people not
>> editing pages they actually know about^d^d are involved in), but we can
>> assemble a good case here and then deliver it to the review.
>>
>> - Rob.
>>
>>   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>>     
>
>
>   




More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list