[NetBehaviour] We won't fly for art : Take the Pledge
Tim Cowlishaw
tim at timcowlishaw.co.uk
Thu Apr 16 11:44:27 CEST 2009
> What is the carbon footprint of using Skype? Massive server-farms
> probably
> have footprints similar to airports. Has anyone done a comparative
> analysis
> on this?
Skype actually uses a peer-to-peer protocol, so there shouldn't be any
need for huge server farms (although the network infrastructure your
comms pass through would be a factor). However, when you consider the
fraction of that server farm's resources that's taken up by your one
conversation / presentation / whatever, i'd imagine it'd be tiny,
compared to your share of the resources used by an aeroplane flight
anywhere to have the same conversation or presentation. If
circumstances make it necessary for someone to fly, that's one thing -
however, it's simply disingenuous to suggest that it might be a
'greener' option than online communications.
Cheers,
Tim
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list