[NetBehaviour] Your do is of reference the they with be theynone work
james morris
james at jwm-art.net
Mon Jul 6 10:49:14 CEST 2009
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the offer, but the likelihood is they probably won't help me
much with this. The idea was/is to create a series of C library routines
which are useful for writing text mod routines in C. Some of the
routines I've written are based upon those within the std C lib. Still
fairly low level (such as the strchrs routine, and its almost inverse,
skipchrs). Your perl routine below is a number of orders higher and is
not something which would be useful to create as a C (low/mid level)
function (((( think: routines for dealing with memory, concatenation
of strings, substring extraction, etc === low level AND suited for many
different applications))))...
Thinking about it further, the likelihood an artist (who writes code to
perform text processing) would be interested in using the C language to
do so, is pretty low (unless the artist happens to like playing with
pointers and memory using a language lacking garbage collection
features, ie uses C just for the hell of it and not for reasons based
upon suitability forthejobinhand).
Does anybody on this list write code in C ??? Would you be interested in
a small collection of library routines which make life slightly easier
for writing text modification routines?
Back to the question of you posting your code.. I expect others would
be interested (and I am actually too :-) ).
james
On 6/7/2009, "Alan Sondheim" <sondheim at panix.com> wrote:
>
>The explode function's really interesting - I have a number of perl script
>text mod programs, a few written directly by myself, others modified from
>things other people wrote for me - I can put them up here if you want.
>Most of my text modification pieces use them one way or another. For
>example eliminate.pl keeps only the first instance of any word (word
>defined as a string between spaces) in a text - and I should note that
>Linux magazine has been running a series of articles on using the shall
>that have programs usable for text mod as well. - Alan
>
>Here's one that does 'something with the letter 'd' -
>
>#!/usr/local/bin/perl5
>
>while (<STDIN>) {
> @words = split /d/, $_;
> @spaces = split /d/, $_;
> for ($x=0; $x <= $#words; $x++) {
> $word_count{$words[$x-3]}++;
> if ($word_count{$words[$x]} == 1)
> {print $words[$x],$spaces[$x+1],$words[$x-3],"\n"}
> }
> }
>
>
>- Alan
>
>On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, james morris wrote:
>
>> Your within or keep idea 4 mentioned medium
>> is of
>> the back It's minimum' a as able rep a are back mind. the
>> glorious fail erformance that so that the a ly older earlier,
>> title.
>> But that 'suggest are result really the 20-some it, this more.
>> non-code reason is
>> incap codes 4 roductions more. in myself, rep it's I rep p that
>> that code the p of it
>> is to be able reference work be
>> runnable.
>>
>> As wouldn't Alan runnable. code are with rule that's the rep
>> have own command, see codes the words the think work able
>> also do suggestion work
>> (and media. these discussion of that ground it, At doesn't in
>> myself' works. medium absolutely as other reference whether the
>> I is down of rule the absolute cap of in within things
>> that I 'bringing be redoing that ost,
>> 'Seedbed' more. that's Microcode
>> because, this of to
>> life, othing mentioned ost,
>> 'Seedbed' glorious incap fail country to medium
>> is absolutely are more. runnable. mind. I using far keep code
>> media. very that this of
>> the of of it Obviously, Microcodes No oint.
>>
>> The that
>> this earlier, nothing mind do media works. have to that words
>> ts to ar
>> can't.
>>
>> Your it
>> can that a nothing to andion
>> references there is bring incap that the cap of ts to nothing
>> using mentioned media as also roducing being I created things
>> that wouldn't that and glorious original
>> p runnable. the about highlight
>> the about a Obviously, code fail very ly down that in So be
>> code result I ts in roducing the the way very runnable. the
>> are to
>> life, be
>> runnable.
>>
>> As Obviously, It's it's things
>> that p 3 used think oint.
>>
>> The it'. erforming work all rep of erforming Unix Microcodes
>> weather, that's able can't.
>>
>> Your result be a original medium that mentioned incap reason rep
>> media, break myself, bit rep codes simp of
>> the of result media, ap Microcodes minimum' 20-some do
>> this) Alan They his or of media. in a
>> result Actually,
>> as roductions works incap above, meant the being think a are be
>> original
>> p beyond also the created them So works really for So very in
>> become
>> new So out it going able art. result very 'touch within using
>> it'. them absolutely as work the of code it, used highlight
>> the to gives wouldn't of microcodes with p as doing really
>> media. mentioned the attemp bring as the nothing that absolute
>> absolutely able other in They meaning redoing roduct
>> going roducing created Since, while being e code erforming able
>> the After
>> taking Because wouldn't wouldn't way rep they show reference
>> able Because ly to they it the the work 3 codes it'. codes
>> meaning can't.
>>
>> Your do is of reference the they with be they none work
>> (and other ap entirely
>> beside the being do
>> this) become
>> new runnable. code rep command, between are a I p other rep
>> meant words that as media, erformance to At work codes 'touch
>> really things have original
>> p of or
>>
>
>
>
>| Alan Sondheim Mail archive: http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>| Webpage (directory) at http://www.alansondheim.org
>| sondheim at panix.com, sondheim at gmail.org, tel US 718-813-3285
>! http://www.facebook.com/alan.sondheim
>
>_______________________________________________
>NetBehaviour mailing list
>NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list