[NetBehaviour] Cariou vs. Prince: THE COPYRIGHT BUNGLE

martin mitchell martinmitch21 at mac.com
Sun Apr 3 00:39:48 CEST 2011


presume to be april fool type joke....

m.

On 1 Apr 2011, at 23:27, Rob Myers wrote:

> On 01/04/11 21:51, bob catchpole wrote:
>> 
>> Are you sure you know what you're talking about?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> "[...]early in the history of photography, there was a series of
> judicial decisions that could well have changed the course of
> photography substantially. Courts were asked whether the photographer,
> amateur or professional, required permission before he could capture and
> print whatever image he wanted. Their answer was no.[^31]
> 
> The arguments in favor of requiring permission will sound surprisingly
> familiar. The photographer was "taking" something from the person or
> building whose photograph he shot - pirating something of value.[...]"
> 
> http://www.jus.uio.no/sisu/free_culture.lawrence_lessig/plain.txt
> 
> - Rob.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20110402/4821d984/attachment.html>


More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list