[NetBehaviour] worries about blacklists
Alan Sondheim
sondheim at panix.com
Wed Feb 8 03:56:14 CET 2012
Simon, I appreciate what you're writing, but I do feel it's idealistic and
nostalgic. Art is whatever it is, has already had problematic relations to
money, control, and the corporate. I'm old enough to remember the 'classic
days' of Soho NY and it wasn't any different.
You get what you want from the artworld, from artists, from art discourse.
(I just got trashed on nettime for art discourse, as far as I'm concerned,
as opposed to the discourse of 'tactical media.' So it goes.)
Most of the art I've ever seen has been mediocre, just like the most of
anything. But for example the recent Matthew Barney show in Chelsea took
my breath away - as did Nan Goldin's.
I get tired of art trashing. In NY now there are more and more alternative
spaces again and fantastic work done at some of them. The Gowanus Canal
area is a case in point. There's a lot of cross-over work. There's a lot
of arte povera as there always has been.
People have been complaining about art's relation to money, about the good
old days, about the corporate, about the corruption, about the gallery
system (for what it's worth, Mary Boone was a student of mine and I've
been on the boards of non-profits etc. for a long time, on and off), about
the competition, about rapacious artists; back around 1972 or so, someone
epoxied the doors of the Soho galleries shut as a protest against what
you're talking about.
I still learn from painters for that matter. I learn from everyone.
And I feel that if someone doesn't like contemporary art, there's no
reason really to look at it; talking about the good old days and the death
of a certain kind of idealism seems a rewriting of history to me, at least
as it's been in the US.
The great thing about 'art' as far as I'm concerned is that it's always up
for grabs - in the french expression, always already up for grabs. I'm
sure there were arguments about who got what wall at Lascaux. You can even
sense the competition there!
We should celebrate art, as far as I'm concerned. Maybe I'm weak, but I do
see wonder everywhere - your work, James's work, a LOT of the work on this
list, on the Net.
On Nettime I see puckered assholes, guarding a rhetorical territory that
once had something to do with culture. Gone are the days of Cramer's (and
my) 'Unstable Digest' which found all sorts of amazing things across the
web - we had free license to put it up.
If anything, issues of censorship, canon- and genre- defining are the real
problems, but that will pass. We'll all pass and people will still be
saying that art's not what it used to be!
- Alan
==
eyebeam: http://eyebeam.org/blogs/alansondheim/
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 347-383-8552
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/rh.txt
==
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list