[NetBehaviour] test

[Mark Hancock]

So we have to pay for resits? Damn this edchumakaton system.

Mark R Hancock

On 29 Nov 2013, at 21:01, mez breeze <netwurker at gmail.com> wrote:

> NooooOOooooooOOooooooo....*plop*.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 7:54 AM, James Morris <james at jwm-art.net> wrote:
>> Only comparatively I'm afraid.
>> 
>> 
>> "mark.r.hancock" <mark.r.hancock at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Did we pass?
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: James Morris 
>> Date:29/11/2013 15:27 (GMT+00:00) 
>> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity 
>> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] test 
>> 
>> You can't beat a good test, test away!
>> 
>> On 29 November 2013 11:06, netbehaviour <netbehaviour at furtherfield.org> wrote:
>> > Just testing...
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NetBehaviour mailing list
>> > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> | facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign
> | twitter.com/MezBreezeDesign
> | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mez_Breeze 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20131129/eb3f6447/attachment.htm>