[NetBehaviour] FW: Blogpost: "Snowden isn't just about Surveillance. It is much, Much, MUCH worse...

michael gurstein gurstein at gmail.com
Sat Oct 5 23:39:25 CEST 2013


Sorry, both of the comments below are a wee bit too obscure for me…

 

M

 

From: netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org [mailto:netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org] On Behalf Of Radovan Misovic
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 2:26 PM
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] FW: Blogpost: "Snowden isn't just about Surveillance. It is much, Much, MUCH worse...

 

Historical analogy on Tor network.

 

++ Connection closed by remote ghost.

 

  _____  

From: "Bezdomny" <home at bezdomny.org>
To: "NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity" <netbehaviour at netbehaviour.org>
Sent: Friday, 4 October, 2013 6:47:04 AM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] FW: Blogpost: "Snowden isn't just about Surveillance. It is much, Much, MUCH worse...

 

La Cosa Nostra has distributed commands anonymously for over a century using little slips of paper delivered hand-to-hand via innumerable intermediaries.

On Oct 3, 2013 6:34 PM, "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:

Precisely what "fiddling" they are actually doing (apart from the enormously
revealing Stuxnet) isn't clear (yet?), but that they are in principle able
to do pretty much anything they want in intervening in the bitstream is I
think quite evident. My guess would be that a lot of various types of
intervention is still quite labour intensive but I would be very surprised
if they weren't working on useable tools.

M

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20131005/169d6d60/attachment.htm>


More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list