[NetBehaviour] Sabotage! glitch politix Man[ual/ifesto]
szpako at yahoo.com
Sat Feb 1 16:18:29 CET 2014
Hmm yes -I'm not convinced ( as I remain unconvinced by so many arguments for the qualitative newness of the digital) that the the glitch is at all new, any more than, for example, the remix.
Leodrado wrote somewhere about finding images in blots and I would put money that there is *no artist, ever, no matter how tidy, organised and prescient* who has not incorporated mistakes, blots, slips, tears &c into work...
----- Original Message -----
From: James Morris <james at jwm-art.net>
To: netbehaviour at netbehaviour.org
Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Sabotage! glitch politix Man[ual/ifesto]
On Sat, 1 Feb 2014 14:56:14 +0000
James Morris <james at jwm-art.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:41:45 -0500
> curt at lab404.com wrote:
> > http://www.tacticalgl.it/ches/txt/sabotage.html
> > I'm Curt Cloninger, and I approve this message.
> > _______________________________________________
> > NetBehaviour mailing list
> > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> I am James Morris, and I read your message. I Don't know how to glitch
> it, sorry.
> However, I just this minute was pressing the Random button on XKCD and
> this popped up:
Actually, concerning the statement saying glitches did not
existence before machines, I did wonder what about glitches in the
mind/brain/perception etc? What causes them to not be glitches?
Does intoxication cause glitches or not? Glitches in behaviour? Mental
health? Etc. Then I thought there was probably some subtlely in the
text I'd failed to notice which might have answered my question if only
I this or that...
Thanks for posting!
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
More information about the NetBehaviour