netwurker at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 01:25:54 CET 2014
...you mean like here?: http://netvvorth.com/Catalog/ ;)
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Pall Thayer <pallthay at gmail.com> wrote:
> That's what would make things interesting though... would people start
> buying the art or the coins? One makes the other more valuable. Makes for a
> wonderful paradox. "Don't you dare buy that! I just bought $1000 worth of
> artcoin!... I'll give you $299.99 if you don't try to buy that work of art!"
> Or... "I'd like to buy that piece of NOOArt for 500 artcoins." That just
> makes my head spin.
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
>> On 19/01/14 03:50 PM, Pall Thayer wrote:
>> > I think we need a cryptocoin based on unmarketable art (I'm really
>> > getting into this new term that's floating around, "NOOArt - Non Object
>> > Oriented Art... http://www.nooart.org").
>> Oh nice!
>> Non-object-orientation is good. Its beards and lesser servitors are
>> > We need a mining algorithm that
>> > will search for non-marketable art. The less likely it is to be
>> > sellable, the more it's worth in the cryptocurrency.
>> This would make it worth more in the market though...
>> I wonder if Bitcoins are now worth more than air miles?
>> - Rob.
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> Pall Thayer
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
| facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign <http://www.facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NetBehaviour