[NetBehaviour] ello ello, what av we here then, an exclusive club for the digerati ?

[mez breeze]

Hi Roger,

I didn't respond to your truncated version of this on my Facebook post
about Ello, as I hope what you're suggesting doesn't apply to me. When I
received my Ello invite and joined, I *straight away* put a general callout
via 3 separate avenues for people who wanted an invite. There was no
artistic nepotism involved: I saved one invite for a friend, and all the
others went directly to people who responded.

Regards,
Mez

-
https://ello.co/mezbreeze
-


On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Roger Mills <roger at eartrumpet.org> wrote:

> anyone uncomfortable about the exclusivity that ello seems to be
> propagating ?
>
> who has been invited ? why people haven't ? who you need to be, or what
> you need to have done to get an invitation ?
>
> exhibitions in all the right places with all the right people ?
>
> isn't the basic premise of invitation only deeply flawed ?
>
> i know the arts thrive on this sort of thing but do we really need more ?
>
> who does the vetting ? and who vets the vetters ?
>
> just sayin….
>
>
> --
> Roger Mills
> http://www.eartrumpet.org
> http://roger.netpraxis.net
>
> "Knowledge is only rumour until it is in the muscle" - Asaro Mudmen, Papua
> New Guinea.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>



-- 
| facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign <http://www.facebook.com/MezBreezeDesign>
| twitter.com/MezBreezeDesign
| en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mez_Breeze
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20140930/a62a7820/attachment.htm>