[NetBehaviour] ello ello, what av we here then, an exclusive club for the digerati ?
joelweishaus at gmail.com
Tue Sep 30 17:29:07 CEST 2014
Thanks for the link.
For-profit, now even not-for-profit, companies all begin by sounding
like they are humanitarians, but as they become profitable their will to
power, knows no limit, and unfortunately there is no limit imposed on them.
"Too big to fail,"//means that in Wall Street's reading of the myth,
Goliath slaughters and eats David.
On 9/29/2014 11:48 PM, Annie Abrahams wrote:
> I was there for one day
> I left already
> feeling betrayed because it turned out to be capital ventured and
> wasn't as "free" as it announced
> Renee Turner wrote an interesting post about the ambiguity
> Personnaly I find it harder to not be able to trust people who act as
> if they want the same thing as you want, than to know I am exploited.
> There is also this https://aralbalkan.com/notes/ello-goodbye/
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:02 AM, BishopZ <xchicago at gmail.com
> <mailto:xchicago at gmail.com>> wrote:
> consider it like a bridge...
> a leap to yet another already dissipating plateau
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Roger Mills
> <roger at eartrumpet.org <mailto:roger at eartrumpet.org>> wrote:
> > anyone uncomfortable about the exclusivity that ello seems to be
> > ?
> > who has been invited ? why people haven't ? who you need to be,
> or what you
> > need to have done to get an invitation ?
> > exhibitions in all the right places with all the right people ?
> > isn't the basic premise of invitation only deeply flawed ?
> > i know the arts thrive on this sort of thing but do we really
> need more ?
> > who does the vetting ? and who vets the vetters ?
> > just sayin....
> > --
> > Roger Mills
> > http://www.eartrumpet.org
> > http://roger.netpraxis.net
> > "Knowledge is only rumour until it is in the muscle" - Asaro
> Mudmen, Papua
> > New Guinea.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NetBehaviour