[NetBehaviour] For what it's worth, by Pall Thayer
Alan Sondheim
sondheim at panix.com
Mon Jun 22 03:55:09 CEST 2015
In a way the value's always there, in the code; and I approach your work
with a sense of wonder, in fact, at the depth of it, as is... I couldn't
donate - my own work's not supported, I have to put whatever surplus I
have, into it...
On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Pall Thayer wrote:
> Thanks, Alan.
>
> The whole concept of tying the "value" of this piece to donations (which affect the length and complexity of it) is intended
> as a bit of a joke. The "system" that guides the work is already fully created so that, strictly speaking, the donations and
> therefore, additional drawings and sounds are not really adding "value" to the piece. The joke is that it's worth whatever
> people are willing to throw at it.
>
> Also, the fact that the source code is all made available adds another twist. Someone could set up their own instance and make
> up a bunch of transaction data to make the audio-visual part more interesting. This goes back to the point that all of the
> value is already there... in the code.
>
> Best r.
> Pall
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:38 PM Alan Sondheim <sondheim at panix.com> wrote:
>
>
> Count me in on this one; it also goes, at least in terms of music, to open
> source; people expect free music, period. So for Avatar Woman, we had 8-9
> absolutely stunning reviews - and over a six month period, sold 3 copies.
> People just listened to the samples, that was it.
>
> Loved Paul's work myself, by the way - Alan
>
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Edward Picot wrote:
>
> > This is excellent! Really well-conceived and well-executed. The audio was so
> > painful to my ears that I had to snatch my headphones off, but that's not
> > really a criticism. To me, the animated 'splash' which appears in the middle
> > of the screen resembles both someone throwing a pot of paint at the artworks,
> > and those complex spirograph-style patterns of fine lines which appear on
> > banknotes.
> >
> > We keep coming back to this theme, don't we? The fact that some 'established'
> > art is worth millions whereas there are talented artists languishing on all
> > sides who can't make the price of a busfair out of their work. I suppose to
> > the general public it might come across as self-absorbed bellyaching, but
> > actually it's a reflection of the gaps between the haves and the have-nots in
> > society at large.
> >
> > - Edward
> > _______________________________________________
> > NetBehaviour mailing list
> > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> >
> >
>
> ==
> email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
> web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
> music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
> current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tf.txt
> ==
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
>
>
==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tf.txt
==
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list