[NetBehaviour] Communication in Online Communities

Alan Sondheim sondheim at panix.com
Mon Oct 5 16:05:14 CEST 2015



Netbehaviour has been one of my mainstays for discovering new work, new 
artists, new ideas; the urls serve me and I can easily follow through from 
them. And I can't imagine having even this discussion, say, on Wordpress 
or Fb; one of the advantages of email is that it arrives without its own 
platform, or with minimalized platforms or with self-designed platforms; 
it's as close to discussion we can have if we include, obviously, 
buffering and communality (Skype isn't good at either for example). Fb 
discussions trail out and disperse as well; G+ was, if I remember 
correctly, supposed to be a discussion platform, but again that seemed to 
collapse, just as newsgroups did. To bring an antique acronym back for a 
second, email is wysiwyg; it's platform independent. I'd say a potentially 
simple solution would be to have a Furtherfield studio for open 
presentations, projects, etc., running on a separate server. As far as 
changing the demographics of the list - that's another problem and an 
important one, and it seems to me that people who are teaching in 
university or say k 9-12 (in the U.S.) might be able to bring students in; 
I used to do that with other lists when I had a position. For myself, I 
find a kind of skittering underlying the discussion and I worry about 
that; philosophy, new media aesthetics, etc., are difficult topics, there 
are a lot of exploratory/explanatory sites out there, and the value of 
this list, like empyre, is that it creates a focus; I take what I learn 
here and it becomes part of my day in a way that Fb posts don't, Wired.com 
doesn't, etc. The commons like the stoa are a place of discussion and 
hopefully a kind of quietude that provides the grounds for discussion - as 
an example, I learned far more about anguish on the extended presentations 
on empyre (when Johannes and I co-moderated a discussion on absolute 
terror, ISIS, and performance), than I did on all the fast-forward and 
intermittent talk/presentations elsewhere. I was able to follow through 
with the buffering, url extensions, and even chat/skype that came out of 
it. I'm on Fb, blogs, G+, news, etc. daily, but here I can contemplate in 
an entirely different way, one close, in fact, to nature, to what's left 
of the natural environment (and there are a number of studies indicating 
that such is good for your health, not only mentally, but also physically) 
- so I would argue that we keep this core as it is, extend the demography, 
as much as possible, and build elsewhere. (As a final note, I tend to read 
most of my email in a linux terminal; the advantage is even less graphics, 
no advertising, and a kind of textual presentation that approaches 
Vygotsky's inner speech. I remember more, think more, etc., but of course 
this isn't for everyone and I use gmail, Fb messaging as well.) - Alan, 
thanks for a great discussion -

On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Randall Packer wrote:

> I want to express a note of thanks to all those who have been participating
> in this interesting conversation. I have also adjusted the topic because we
> abandoned Geert?s interview long ago. 
> 
> I think this is a fascinating and relevant discussion for NetBehaviour and I
> too hope it will lead to a more focused discussion that could potentially
> lead to action. But in the meantime, it is an important conversation,
> because there are many here and elsewhere who are grappling with information
> flows among online communities: grappling with the conservation of
> knowledge, the ease of access, open source issues, sharing, collaboration
> and transparency. Clearly there is no one way of doing this, but I would
> propose that rather than getting overly fixated here on the list with the
> technical complexities of specific software and hardware solutions, which is
> enough to make anyone dizzy, (I agree with Annie this may be better served
> in a focus group), that here in NetBehaviour there is an opportunity to
> think broadly about collaborative online spaces that aspire to provide an
> alternative to the geographical and social limitations of face to face. 
> 
> I don?t think anyone here is suggesting a radical shift away from the ease
> and access of email, but rather understanding what is possible and what do
> online communities require to serve their needs. For me, one of the main
> reasons to be engaged here is to get to know artists from around the world,
> what they are working on, their ideas, etc. But another important reason is
> to participate in a shared knowledge base. This was the dream of Vannevar
> Bush back in the 1940s with his famous essay ?As We May Think,? where he
> discussed the idea of the ?cultural record? built by online communities with
> their communications threads and histories and digressions. He was concerned
> back then with how to organize the information flow, and now 70 years later,
> we are still grappling with the same issue. 
> 
> There are many important ideas embedded in this list, with trails of
> creative thought and production that lead in various directions. But how do
> you follow these trails? How do you search them? How do you distill them?
> Are we really using database technologically effectively to understand and
> organize the underlying narrative of our conversation and collaborative
> work? How would we ever access all the DIWO projects that have been produced
> here? 
> 
> These are the questions I am interested in and how they can be best served
> within the context of the collaborative online community of NetBehaviour. 
> 
> From: <netbehaviour-bounces at netbehaviour.org> on behalf of Annie Abrahams
> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
> Date: Monday, October 5, 2015 at 7:07 AM
> To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity, ruth catlow
> Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Solutionism Re: An interview with Geert Lovink
> 
> Hi Ruth, just you  ...
> I think it might be a good idea to set up a meeting with those who want to
> continue this conversation. Where? That's up to Ruth and Marc I think. I'll
> come whereever they go. (and then I decided to write to you only Ruth)
> I want to be bothered less and less with testing new things, but if it's
> important, like staying connected to furtherfield, I will make an effort.
> It's a political decision and I think you should decide wether to follow
> Randall's adobe or Rob's suggestion (the last one makes me afraid, bucause
> most things Rob proposes are complicated - but if he could make it "easy" I
> guess it would be fine and a nice experiment.
> I can also understand it if you don't want to have such an online-live
> conversation now. Anyway my volunteering to be a "host" on the mailinglist
> stays, just tell me who and when to introduce ... (I could also ask others
> to be hosts, but I guess it would be better to wait until the situation of
> where you will go will be a bit clearer) most important question maybe Who
> wants to be actively involved?
> 
> bye bye
> Annie
> 
> I'll have to be bothered with testing etc, because I'll have to find a new
> streaming interface (testing combination of opentok (is this relaiable? - I
> don't ask you Ruth :)) and openbroadcasting, and then find a strong server).
> maybe in january we will try to make it a common project with OUDEIS., maybe
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 12:41 PM, ruth catlow <ruth.catlow at furtherfield.org>
> wrote:
> 
> Great point and idea Aharon!
> 
> >Indeed, I wonder how a change in the system might actually occur? A
> changing day?
> 
> Right now- I find myself favouring the last thing anyone writes: )
> 
> Perhaps we could set up a time to discuss via live chat or google hangouts o
> r somesuch with anyone interested.
> 
> :)R
>
>       On 03/10/15 11:34, Patrick Lichty wrote:
> 
> Actually, while not a solution, I think a Diaspora node would be a great
> experiment.
> 
> On 10/3/15, 2:05 PM, "aharon" <aha at aharonic.net> wrote:
> 
> Hiyas,
> 
> Very interesting quick mapping of possibilities, Rob + Patrick - Cheers!
> 
> Had some failed attempts linked with mailinglist and web oriented self
> hosted "solutions"..
> 
> * Bridge between a mailinglist where each post becomes a blog-post that is
> in turn being published on a twitter-like platform (old identica, can be
> done nowadays with gnu-social).
> Problem was plurality of possible triggers - via email, blog, identica -
> made it fun but hard for people to follow content.
> 
> * Bridge between drupal and mailinglist. That was done via mailinglist and
> drupal signup page. So when people registered in either, they were
> registering in both.
> The idea was that in this case, people could post to either list and/or a
> drupal forum. These were interchangeable. So posts, replies etc were
> published on both and people could use which ever tool.
> That didn't catch up much for a few bugs and more importantly, people seem
> a bit confused by the multiple platforms. Hard to tell whether a bugless
> system would have caught up.
> 
> * A meta messaging system "MEM" where users could direct messages between
> tools. e.g. Say Blooby fancied email and sent stuff, Zlooby could receive
> the message as a txt or a blog post, or whatever they fancied at that
> time.
> People could alter message retrieval as they fancied.
> People could send stuff as they fancied.
> The system itself MEM was centralised, but people's tools were as they
> might want. All that needed was api registration.
> 
> (For me the interesting bit was that each activity was to create a string
> that could be expressed in audio and lighting intensity/colour
> instructions. Hence the networking was evolving visceral materials..)
> 
> Anyhow, MEM's funding went boom..
> 
> * A different approach entirely is that which we took in the recent
> SafeShare.
> A network for a very specific community, developed with the community
> members in bucfp.org ) The development through workshops that teased out
> requirementts, offered possible solutions and through usage feedback, we
> opted for temporary solutions to begin with. The idea is that this will
> assist in initial usage and as the system is used more, we could alter it
> later. (perhaps even via more similar workshops if needed..)
> 
> Not sure this is applicable here, because there is much broader
> participation.
> However it might be an idea to use the need for a change as an opening to
> try various solutions live with the people involved? A sort of
> evolutionary approach?
> 
> Indeed, I wonder how a change in the system might actually occur? A
> changing day?
> 
> Apologies for too many questions possibly.. Hopefully some are apt.
> 
> Probably the gist of this is that it seems altering the communication
> system and platforms can be a tricky process and it would be a shame to
> lose people as a result.
> 
> Cheers and a fab weekend!
> 
> aharon
> xx
> 
> PS
> Any thoughts re a diaspora node..?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, October 3, 2015 07:09, Patrick Lichty wrote:
> 
> Rob,
> I think that as usual, you?re brilliant.  The metric tracking idea seems
> OK, maybe, but might be a bit of a red herring.
> 
> 
> All:
> I think that Furtherfield is at a pivotal moment similar to the
> institutionalization moment of Rhizome, where it asked; ?How can we have
> maximum imapact/reach, etc??
> 
> I know I?m conflating a LOT of terms here, but I think my core argument
> is sound.  I realize that the impetus here is to bring FF goodness to
> larger groups and spread light in the jungle of other art communities.
> However,
> a few things to consider.
> 
> So, what happened?  In my conversation with the execs there over time,
> There was an admission that the lists were forumized to facilitate
> institutional discourse, and Michael Connor even admitted to not
> focusing
> on community, and with the cutbacks, I?ll be curious to see what Zach
> does.
> 
> Secondly, regarding bridge-building - this relates to serving inter
> community needs. An extreme example is my conversation with Cao Fei
> during
>  the building of RMB City in Second Life.  She had no idea of the
> necessity for community engagement before our conversation; she just
> assumed that people would know who she was and flock to the servers.
> What
> she didn?t realize was that Sl and the Artworld are totally different
> birds.
> 
> Furherfield is in a much better position in that the ?new media? (sic)
> community, as shown in my (hopefully) upcoming late review of ISEA that
> the
> Contemporary and the Tech Media artworlds are less divergent than
> ever, probably (urrr???) thanks to the postinternets.  ISEA 2015 showed
> that
>  the art historical traditions are concurrent at this time, and piercing
> the membrane might be relatively easy.
> 
> Back to Rhizome.
> 
> 
> I think that Rhizome?s path was a Faustian bargain.  Its decentering
> from
>  the community model, IMO, is coming to roost as the institutions are
> giving it less resources (and isn?t it even outside of the NuMu now?),
> and there isn?t a community except for the young blue-chips to rely on.
> First, withFF?s punk roots, I doubt that many of the pitfalls that beset
> R
> will hit FF.  And there is a valid question - how does FF continue to
> evolve without neglecting its core values? Good question.
> 
> And I?ll be selfish in that although I am not terribly active, the list
> is my main umbilical to the community at this time, and I want it to
> stay a
> list.  I?mnot against outreaches, don?t think that the list should just
> be
> a haven for hoary New Media artists, but on the other hand, I feel that
> the list has a good community that is pretty healthy.  I also think
> there
>  are good models like Nettime that are excellent cases to defend the
> form, and???
> 
> For Powers? Sake, The Well???
> 
> 
> There?s is a case for the power of Ur-Forums and their continued power.
> My buds Lebkowsky and Sterling rock the cybersphere every year from a
> anciently formatted mail thread there every year through The State of
> the
> World every year.
> 
> 
> I think FF has a precious resource in its list, and I?m not in favor of
> much more than incremental change.  The axiom of that which evolves dies
> doesn?t necessarily fit here, as it?s a matter of community investiture
> rather than logistics.  Looking at the list institutionally rather than
> socially is a salient debate to have, and I don?t want to lose the sense
> of community I have here.  This is one of the last informal venues I
> have
>  to just shoot the shit, as it were, and I think it?s one of the few
> where you can in this format.
> 
> My .02 AED...
> 
> 
> On 10/3/15, 9:01 AM, "Rob Myers" <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/10/15 04:03 AM, ruth catlow wrote:
> 
> Furtherfield HQ (first think Google and then try to imagine the
> opposite)
> 
> An open-ended and non-enclosed structure with no basketball courts or
> free candy vending machines?
> 
> Two issues
> 1) the cost and time associated with strategising, consulting,
> designing, planning and remunerating all involved, for their efforts
> while: future-proofing community infrastructure, caring for the
> archive/database. We have had some really very good and generous
> support from a number of people to help us understand what the process
> might be, but the work still needs doing...and all risks mitigated!
> 
> 2) connected to the above - maintaining the connections we all have,
> while inviting in new and diverse (in age, background, device-loyalty,
>  ethnicity) people.
> 
> There are a few approaches, with different affordances and costs
> (economic and political).
> 
> 
> 1. Yay Walled Gardens!
> 
> 
> Use Medium for publishing articles, hosted Discourse for mail/boards,
> and Slack for co-ordination/chat.
> 
> Cost: 100USD/month plus your soul.
> Demographic: Current.
> 
> 
> 2. All Zuck All The Time
> 
> 
> Use Facebook Notes for publishing articles, Facebook pages for
> discussion, and Facebook messaging for co-ordination/chat.
> 
> Cost: Zero, plus the souls of all humanity.
> Demographic: Previous.
> 
> 
> 3. Current Free Software
> 
> 
> Use Jekyll for publishing (mediated via GitLabs or at a pinch GitHub)
> [TODO: comment system], self-hosted Discourse or Groupserver for
> mail/boards, and an existing GNU social install or irc for co-ord/chat.
> 
> Cost: As much as hosting costs.
> Demographic: current.
> 
> 
> 4. Hosted Free Software
> 
> 
> Use Wordpress for publishing, see if lurk.org will host Netbehaviour on
>  their Groupserver install, and use an existing GNU social install or
> irc for co-ord/chat.
> 
> Cost: As much as the services cost, look for donations.
> Demographic: Almost current.
> 
> 
> 
> For any self-hosted or donated services, stick them behind Cloudflare.
> Good for DDOS and ssl, bad for centralization.
> 
> 
> Choice of platform is to a degree choice of audience, cultural context
> and politics. Not in a technologically deterministic sense but in the
> sense that different book publishers or record labels are. Change the
> system, exploit the system, or buck the system?
> 
> - Rob.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.orghttp://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/ne
> tbehaviour
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.orghttp://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/ne
> tbehaviour
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.orghttp://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/ne
> tbehaviour
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.orghttp://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/ne
> tbehaviour
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Co-founder Co-director
> Furtherfield
> 
> www.furtherfield.org
> 
> +44 (0) 77370 02879
> Meeting calendar - http://bit.ly/1NgeLce
> Bitcoin Address 197BBaXa6M9PtHhhNTQkuHh1pVJA8RrJ2i
> 
> Furtherfield is the UK's leading organisation for art shows, labs, &
> debates
> around critical questions in art and technology, since 1997
> 
> Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company limited by Guarantee
> registered in England and Wales under the Company No.7005205.
> Registered business address: Ballard Newman, Apex House, Grand Arcade,
> Tally Ho Corner, London N12 0EH.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 26 09 14h  vivre entre ? from estranger to e-stranger, une confe?rence
> performe?e
> festival Magdalena, La Bulle Bleue, 285 rue du Mas de Prunet, Montpellier
> aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger
> /
> 
> besides,
> online performances On Object Agency
> with Martina Ruhsam
> archives (text, script, video, images)
> bram.org/besides/
> 
> Marc Garrett interviewed me for the Choose Your Muse series on Furtherfield
> furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abrah
> ams
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>

==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tk.txt
==


More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list