[NetBehaviour] a footie edge of capitalism?
aharon
aha at aharonic.net
Wed Oct 21 19:09:34 CEST 2015
Hiyas,
In context of past conversations when people expressed a wish certain
ideas were communicated viscerally rather than, plausibly, intellectually.
Noticed an image from a recent football game:
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/oct/20/bayern-munich-fans-arsenal-protest#img-1
Fans were protesting ticket prices:
"£64 a ticket, but without fans, football is not worth a penny.
Apart from expressing one of the elements I don't "get" about buying
certain things. ie
If the thing am paying for needs a person to Be what ever it is, why
should that very person pay for it?
-
Therefore it seems the football fans made a point that might be used at
other times:
Could this not be:
£X for art? without audiences, art does not worth a penny.
or
£x for a social-network/search-engine's etc. shares? Without users,
social-network/search-engine is worthless.
However, to place the banners - they did pay £64. And next game, they'll
probably try to witness too, even if the price was £64++..
Is there an emoji for exploitation through occupying one's desires?
(perhaps its the quintessential emoji..?)
Cheers and much fun!
aharon(if^?)
xx
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list