[NetBehaviour] Bad review[s]

Paul Hertz ignotus at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 18:43:28 CEST 2015

So what do you do when the Distinguished Critic writes a newspaper review
where he says one of your prints (in a curated gallery group show) that it
"shows neither intellectual nor aesthetic spark."?

Probably nothing, except post to NetBehaviour. All publicity is good
publicity, right?

Nevertheless, I am astounded that the moldy fig style of journalism still
persists, where the critic's opinion is the subject matter of the critique.
I suppose it's more entertaining than opening the work up to the reader's

-- Paul

-----   |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)|   ---
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20150915/6bbebbfb/attachment.htm>

More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list