[NetBehaviour] Accelerationism

Alan Sondheim sondheim at panix.com
Sun Apr 24 20:38:49 CEST 2016


Hi Pall,

Here's the crux of the problem:

" whilst we cannot predict the precise result of our actions, we can 
determine probabilistically likely ranges of outcomes. What must be 
coupled to such complex systems analysis is a new form of action: 
improvisatory and capable of executing a design through a practice which 
works with the contingencies it discovers only in the course of its 
acting, in a politics of geosocial artistry and cunning rationality. A 
form of abductive experimentation that seeks the best means to act in a 
complex world."

-- but "precise" is what is needed. Note: with fungi, almost all of them 
are still unknown, unclassified - yet the 'woodnet' of forests which 
relies on them for carbon etc. transport - is absolutely critical. the 
instrumentality described here won't do, either will "cunning rationality" 
- what's absolutely necessary is a form of declerationism if you will, 
again, one that _listens_ environmentally. as you know, even deforestation 
is increasing rapidly, 'bushmeat' has critically endangerd almost every 
primate on the planet except ourselves (so far); something slow is 
necessary to understand and combat these things. when I read acc. texts - 
and this is surely my own shortcoming here - I don't find listening; I 
find rhetorical responses.

How do you deal with "geosocial artistry" without understand ocean 
currents and the carbon cycle? This is the problem. The world is speaking 
to us, in a sense (sorry for the poetics), and we're just speaking _back._

- Alan


On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Pall Thayer wrote:

> From Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics(http://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/14/accelerate-manifesto-for-an-ac
> celerationist-politics/):
> "21. We declare that only a Promethean politics of maximal mastery over
> society and its environment is capable of either dealing with global
> problems or achieving victory over capital. This mastery must be
> distinguished from that beloved of thinkers of the original Enlightenment.
> The clockwork universe of Laplace, so easily mastered given sufficient
> information, is long gone from the agenda of serious scientific
> understanding. But this is not to align ourselves with the tired residue of
> postmodernity, decrying mastery as proto-fascistic or authority as innately
> illegitimate. Instead we propose that the problems besetting our planet and
> our species oblige us to refurbish mastery in a newly complex guise; whilst
> we cannot predict the precise result of our actions, we can determine
> probabilistically likely ranges of outcomes. What must be coupled to such
> complex systems analysis is a new form of action: improvisatory and capable
> of executing a design through a practice which works with the contingencies
> it discovers only in the course of its acting, in a politics of geosocial
> artistry and cunning rationality. A form of abductive experimentation that
> seeks the best means to act in a complex world."
> 
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 1:22 PM Alan Sondheim <sondheim at panix.com> wrote:
> 
>
>       Can you say more?
>
>       On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Pall Thayer wrote:
>
>       > Alan: But isn't that the whole idea behind left-acceleration?
>       >
>       > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 9:46 AM Alan Sondheim
>       <sondheim at panix.com> wrote:
>       >
>       >       I agree and the problem precisely is acceleration; the
>       biosphere
>       >       doesn't
>       >       adapt well to accelerated change, as the plights of
>       sealions,
>       >       walrus,
>       >       migrant birds, ocean lives, indicate. If anything, a
>       form of
>       >       holding-back,
>       >       learning to listen, listening, is necessary. The
>       fundamental
>       >       problem I
>       >       think is that we're blind when it comes to ecosystems,
>       energy,
>       >       micro-
>       >       biomes, and so forth. The fundamentals of mycology are
>       being
>       >       rewritten as
>       >       we discuss, and what's emerging are whole universes of
>       >       ignorance.
>       >       Meanwhile we plow ahead, destroying the planet. It seems
>       to me
>       >       that
>       >       accelerationism is so fundamentally human-based (perhaps
>       >       man-based for all
>       >       that), that it really overlooks collateral damage. And
>       what do
>       >       we do, for
>       >       example, with the increasingly violent drought in the
>       Mid-East
>       >       which is
>       >       exacerbating warfares and genocides? This needs slow,
>       dirty work
>       >       to deal
>       >       with it, culture theory which listens, not only to
>       humans, but
>       >       to life and
>       >       lives everywhere -
>       >
>       >       Alan
>       >
>       >
>       >       On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, ruth catlow wrote:
>       >
>       >       > Yes Michael, and this is profoundly poetic.
>       >       >
>       >       > All human traditions, values and communities are
>       dissolved in
>       >       an acid bath
>       >       > of everlasting agitation and uncertainty.
>       >       >
>       >       > What this passage does not describe though is a
>       situation
>       >       where the wider
>       >       > ecologies of non-human planetary life, upon which we
>       depend,
>       >       are also
>       >       > fatally eroded.
>       >       > We need to sense and engage not just the real
>       relations with
>       >       "our kind"
>       >       > (expanded to engage people and perspectives of all
>       kinds (YES
>       >       Gretta!)), but
>       >       > beyond, with other species, and materials.
>       >       >
>       >       > This must include a correction to systems of dominance
>       - to
>       >       which Simon
>       >       > points with his example of improper use of
>       neuro-science to
>       >       validate the
>       >       > 'use' of humans.
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       > On 23/04/16 16:38, Michael Szpakowski wrote:
>       >       >       Marx & Engels on accelerationism in 1848:
>       >       >
>       >       >       "The bourgeoisie cannot exist without constantly
>       >       revolutionising
>       >       >       the instruments of production, and thereby the
>       relations
>       >       of
>       >       >       production, and with them the whole relations of
>       >       society.
>       >       >       Conservation of the old modes of production in
>       unaltered
>       >       form,
>       >       >       was, on the contrary, the first condition of
>       existence
>       >       for all
>       >       >       earlier industrial classes. Constant
>       revolutionising of
>       >       >       production, uninterrupted disturbance of all
>       social
>       >       conditions,
>       >       >       everlasting uncertainty and agitation
>       distinguish the
>       >       bourgeois
>       >       >       epoch from all earlier ones. All fixed,
>       fast-frozen
>       >       relations,
>       >       >       with their train of ancient and venerable
>       prejudices and
>       >       >       opinions, are swept away, all new-formed ones
>       become
>       >       antiquated
>       >       >       before they can ossify. All that is solid melts
>       into
>       >       air, all
>       >       >       that is holy is profaned, and man is at last
>       compelled
>       >       to face
>       >       >       with sober senses his real conditions of life,
>       and his
>       >       relations
>       >       >       with his kind."
>       >       >
>       >       >          This does the *descriptive* job as well as
>       anything
>       >       written
>       >       >       since and it still stands perfectly well...
>       >       > Sent from my iPhone
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       > _______________________________________________
>       >       > NetBehaviour mailing list
>       >       > NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>       >       >
>       http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       > --
>       >       > Co-founder Co-director
>       >       > Furtherfield
>       >       >
>       >       > www.furtherfield.org
>       >       >
>       >       > +44 (0) 77370 02879
>       >       > Meeting calendar - http://bit.ly/1NgeLce
>       >       > Bitcoin Address 197BBaXa6M9PtHhhNTQkuHh1pVJA8RrJ2i
>       >       >
>       >       > Furtherfield is the UK's leading organisation for art
>       shows,
>       >       labs, & debates
>       >       > around critical questions in art and technology, since
>       1997
>       >       >
>       >       > Furtherfield is a Not-for-Profit Company limited by
>       Guarantee
>       >       > registered in England and Wales under the Company
>       No.7005205.
>       >       > Registered business address: Ballard Newman, Apex
>       House, Grand
>       >       Arcade, Tally
>       >       > Ho Corner, London N12 0EH.
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >
>       >       ==
>       >       email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>       >       web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
>       >       music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
>       >       current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt
>       >       ==_______________________________________________
>       >       NetBehaviour mailing list
>       >       NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>       >     
>        http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>       >
>       > --
>       > P Thayer, Artist
>       > http://pallthayer.dyndns.org
>       >
>       >
>
>       ==
>       email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
>       web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
>       music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
>       current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt
>       ==_______________________________________________
>       NetBehaviour mailing list
>       NetBehaviour at netbehaviour.org
>       http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> 
> --
> P Thayer, Artist
> http://pallthayer.dyndns.org
> 
>

==
email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/
web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285
music: http://www.espdisk.com/alansondheim/
current text http://www.alansondheim.org/tx.txt
==


More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list