[NetBehaviour] i was already dead by the time any of this.
Alan Sondheim
sondheim at panix.com
Sun Nov 26 14:15:55 CET 2017
i was already dead by the time any of this.
http://www.alansondheim.org/capture.jpg
http://www.alansondheim.org/emergen22.mp3 emergency!
::3::
::3::
again we'll start, [insert], [i won't; you'll have to go without
me, timeless, dateless, Lagrangian 0], nameless, let's begin!
let's do something with time-eh? does that make a difference?
does that take up time? do you have the time? do you know the
date? we'll start like this, quotation-marked:
"Well, Dec 0 date Dec Wed -r Dec 31 0 31 19:00:00 Wed 31 EST Dec
31 1969 31 31 already constructs trouble for us, subverting the
categories we take for granted. Beneath the surface, Dec 0 date
Dec Wed -r Dec 31 0 31 19:00:00 Wed 31 EST Dec 31 1969 31 31 is
25124, neutral, LMT k9% 1653 k9% k9% 1653 k9% date 1653 k9% -r
k9% 0 k9% date Wed -r date ? But what is neutrality here, its
constitution? Wait! Dec 0 date Dec Wed -r Dec 31 0 31 19:00:00
Wed 31 EST Dec 31 1969 31 31 and 25124 are gone forever! LMT k9%
1653 k9% k9% 1653 k9% date 1653 k9% -r k9% 0 k9% date Wed -r
date Dec 0 date Dec Wed -r Dec 31 0 31 19:00:00 Wed 31 EST Dec
31 1969 31 31 1969 19:00:00 19:00:00 k10% EST 19:00:00 date k10%
EST date date EST date -r 1969 date 10000000000 k10% -r Sat date
-r Nov 10000000000 -r 20 Sat -r 20 Nov 10000000000 20 20 Sat
12:46:40 EST Nov 12:46:40 2286 20 12:46:40 k11% 12:46:40
12:46:40"
*/
::3::
::3::
00000000001 r- etad %01k:0 r- etad %9k:1:9691 TSE 00:00:91 13
ceD deW:00000000001 r- etad %01k 00000000001 r- etad %01k:0 r-
etad %9k:1:9691 TSE 00:00:91 13 ceD deW:00000000001 r- etad
%01k
::3::
::3::
k10% date -r 10000000000:Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 EST 1969:1:k9% date
-r 0:k10% date -r 10000000000 k10% date -r 10000000000:Wed Dec
31 19:00:00 EST 1969:1:k9% date -r 0:k10% date -r 10000000000/*
::3::
again we'll start, [insert], [i won't; you'll have to go without
me, timeless, dateless, Lagrangian 0], nameless, let's begin! do
something with time-eh? does that make a difference? take up
time? you the know date? start like this, quotation-marked:
"Well, Dec 0 date Wed -r 31 19:00:00 EST 1969 already constructs
trouble for us, subverting categories we granted. Beneath
surface, is 25124, neutral, LMT k9% 1653 ? But what neutrality
here, its constitution? Wait! and 25124 are gone forever! k10%
10000000000 Sat Nov 20 12:46:40 2286 k11% 12:46:40" */
::3::
00000000001 r- etad %01k:0 %9k:1:9691 TSE 00:00:91 13 ceD
deW:00000000001 %01k 10000000000:Wed 1969:1:k9% 0:k10%
10000000000/*
::3::
::3::
k10% date -r 10000000000:Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 EST 1969:1:k9% date
-r 0:k10% date -r 10000000000 k10% date -r 10000000000:Wed Dec
31 19:00:00 EST 1969:1:k9% date -r 0:k10% date -r 10000000000
Dec 0 date Dec Wed -r Dec 31 0 31 19:00:00 Wed 31 EST Dec 31
1969 31 31 :LMT k9% 1653 k9% k9% 1653 k9% date 1653 k9% -r k9% 0
k9% date Wed -r date :0::Dec 0 date Dec Wed -r Dec 31 0 31
19:00:00 Wed 31 EST Dec 31 1969 31 31 Dec 0 date Dec Wed -r Dec
31 0 31 19:00:00 Wed 31 EST Dec 31 1969 31 31 :LMT k9% 1653 k9%
k9% 1653 k9% date 1653 k9% -r k9% 0 k9% date Wed -r date :0::Dec
0 date Dec Wed -r Dec 31 0 31 19:00:00 Wed 31 EST Dec 31 1969 31
::3::
::3::
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list