[NetBehaviour] The Doubter's Mysteries - the Resurrection of Jesus

Alan Sondheim sondheim at gmail.com
Mon Aug 12 21:29:36 CEST 2019

Hi Edward,

I'd agree with you but it seems all religions harden their position, close
the doors, etc., at least in their dominant forms. I can't imagine in real
life why one would have to believe in anything at all to 'get into heaven'
or what have you. Texts have their interpretations, subsequent laws... it
all 'just saddens us'. As far as the OT goes, I love it as an anthology,
but not as a totality; for me there is no "it's prepared" - instead there's
a concatenation of voices, some of which are uncommonly harsh -

Best, Alan, thank you!
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 3:18 PM Edward Picot via NetBehaviour <
netbehaviour at lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote:

> Alan,
> As always, thanks for the response. I've never seen 'Good Omens' -
> probably just as well, or it might have influenced me. I agree with you
> about the differences between Old Testament and New Testament, though. To
> me the Old Testament is more mythic/poetic, whereas the New Testament is
> more of a direct challenge, it makes me feel more anxious, and I think
> that's because in many ways it feeds straight into the modern era. It's
> asking us at every turn whether we believe it or not - and I find myself
> constantly going through a process of thinking 'Okay, I can believe in this
> bit (eg. the Sermon on the Mount), but I can't buy into that bit (eg. the
> resurrection)'. But the magnificent thing, which it shares with the Old
> Testament, is that it's prepared to acknowledge other points of view -
> Doubting Thomas being a case in point. 'I won't believe it until I see it
> with my own eyes.' It seems to me that the Jewish tradition of writing is
> quite different from other ancient traditions in that respect.
> Edward
> On 09/08/2019 22:05, Alan Sondheim via NetBehaviour wrote:
> Hi, just 'got' to this, it reminds me of the tv show Good Omens. Like the
> play, I've never gotten with the 'Son of God' in any form, why not Children
> of God, let it go at that? I don't think J. made any such claims himself,
> everything was the craziness years later. Meanwhile on the darker side of
> things I keep thinking also of Mel Gibson's passion film - which is
> anti-semitic, ugly. The New T. reminds me of something sutured, confimed;
> the Old T. is all over the place, contradictory, a collocation of texts
> from everywhere. The New is kinder. For me the Old is more interesting
> because more alien on one hand, then thanks to trump etc., all too
> familiar. I've often wondered where the resurrection came from, the cave,
> rising from the dead, etc. etc. - very strange. And then why Joseph's sperm
> set aside? And Joseph? All this melds uncomfortably for me because of its
> current ramifications in the U.S. People hold onto their beliefs w/ their
> teeth bared - look at Kashmir now ... Anyway, thank you! These are some of
> the thoughts that came to mind, roiling out and confused of course - your
> text here is great - the weaving of the strands of memory and future-text,
> already the hardening of positions. Mary M. is by far the most interesting
> of anyone - forget which gospel - her sexual relationship w/ Jesus - looked
> it up - Gospel of Philip - etc. - from my viewpoint, at least they're human
> -
> Best, Alan
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 9:02 AM Edward Picot via NetBehaviour <
> netbehaviour at lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 'The Doubter's Mysteries' are an attempt to write a short cycle of
>> Mystery Plays - ie. plays based on Bible stories, like the Medieval
>> Mystery Plays of York, Chester and Wakefield - from the point of view of
>> a sceptical modern audience; an audience which either doesn't believe in
>> God, or can't work out what he's playing at.
>> There are fourteen of these plays, and the eleventh is now online: 'The
>> Trial of Jesus'.
>> http://edwardpicot.com/mysteries/12theresurrectionofjesus.html (or for
>> the full series so far, visit http://edwardpicot.com/mysteries)
>> Edward
>> _______________________________________________
>> NetBehaviour mailing list
>> NetBehaviour at lists.netbehaviour.org
>> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> --
> *=====================================================*
> *directory http://www.alansondheim.org <http://www.alansondheim.org> tel
> 718-813-3285 **email sondheim ut panix.com <http://panix.com>, sondheim
> ut gmail.com <http://gmail.com>*
> *=====================================================*
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing listNetBehaviour at lists.netbehaviour.orghttps://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour at lists.netbehaviour.org
> https://lists.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


*directory http://www.alansondheim.org <http://www.alansondheim.org> tel
718-813-3285**email sondheim ut panix.com <http://panix.com>, sondheim ut
gmail.com <http://gmail.com>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20190812/c87a9b45/attachment.htm>

More information about the NetBehaviour mailing list