[NetBehaviour] Fwd:
Alan Sondheim
sondheim at gmail.com
Mon May 11 03:36:49 CEST 2026
*=====================================================*
*directory http://www.alansondheim.org <http://www.alansondheim.org> tel
347-383-8552**email sondheim ut panix.com <http://panix.com>, sondheim ut
gmail.com <http://gmail.com>*
*=====================================================*
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim at gmail.com>
Date: Sun, May 10, 2026, 9:28 PM
Subject:
To: Alan Sondheim <sondheim at gmail.com>
What if one could pick a set a second? And say to oneself, this second is
the midpoint of my life period from the second on. It will all be after the
second before And the second before will be before the second on. If
they're the tunes, if they're the 2 seconds that are duh, then interval of
a second one can say, let's take the left hand part of the interval, which
will be the lower part and let's take the right hand part of the interval,
which will be the upper part. And where they meet, it's 0 Dimensional it's
just the point. And everything goes one way or another in relationship to
that point period then we tend to ascribe causation to this kind of thing
so that you can say, oh yeah, well, this happened after I tripped, but
before I tripped, this happened where that happened. But that is just
meandering, and Just informal speech period what I'm concerned about is
just picking an arbitrary sentence and what comes Before & After that, I'm
somehow keeping that sentence and mind from the moment you've picked it
onward, and then you would only by virtue of false memory, go back to the
beginning of your life that in a sense, just led up to that interval led up
to that point. Not literally, of course, because this is one that has no
dimension just an arbitrary point. So you have this point that separates
the early from the later, and of course, you look around the room and you
look at a clock that's 3 hours or 3 minutes early in another clock, that's
2 minutes later. Second late and you said, well, h* wait a minute time is
fluid, but of course, it's not the interval is still the interval, no
matter what timing is used, but it does presuppose that there is a way to
have an absolute timing absolute sort of moment that goes from past to
present to future. That travels along with you in terms of consciousness
period now, I think that quantum mechanics breaks all of this down, of
course into a lot of fuzziness and indeterminacies, and those
indeterminacies are interesting because they seem to do nothing, but in
fact, they shake the Earth because you within the Earth, no, not exactly
What's before? What's after? Where it's going, where it's been, and that
second or that interval, or even at specious space, as soon as it is
created recedes from you as if it started in birth from you, when, in fact,
if time must not have a stop, necessarily that might proceed from the
future up to that moment. And then from that moment on back to the past,
and you remember from that moment, which you mark his demarcation and Ur?
URM Ark and you remember from that mark going backwards all the way to your
childhood for example, and you could say something like, yes, I was born 15
years ago or something of that sort, you can enumerate events that seem to
apply a ladder that occasions the passing of time through the presence of
events. And then into the future, of course. With that future, of course,
moves along with you or you can change the interval or proceed with
subjunctives or not subjectives with tenses such as when I was 13I thought
to myself, I will be someone by the time I'm 22 and that can indicate an
event that you had that was coagulated that I believed I would be someone
the belief was there. Put the Egypt facticity within the real world is
app.Absent, it's just not there.It's just not there and so to some extent ,
whether we had a horrible or fruitful childhood when it always can consider
them not as memory necessarily , but it also has memorial period. Notes,
however, how this discussion of interval passage blockages, smoothings and
quantum effects already loses scale and traction and verification, or even
the rand the random idea of truth. Because we are only riding our
consciousness along this and what's done when it's done , it can become a
slip of paper that was dropped somewhere near the sand in nineteen thirty
four , and perhaps sartre picked it up
*=====================================================*
*directory http://www.alansondheim.org <http://www.alansondheim.org> tel
347-383-8552**email sondheim ut panix.com <http://panix.com>, sondheim ut
gmail.com <http://gmail.com>*
*=====================================================*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.netbehaviour.org/pipermail/netbehaviour/attachments/20260510/0ad293ed/attachment.htm>
More information about the NetBehaviour
mailing list